Today's Supreme Court bombshell killing Roe v Wade was the culmination point of the goddam Trump Presidency. At least, for most of his goddam supporters. The minority of 'em – what was once the goddam fringe but is not the mainstream – the misogynistic, homophobic racists who had been hiding in the dark waiting for Trump all their goddam lives – don't give a fuck about Roe. But the majority of his supporters, those classic Republicans who typically only care about themselves (and therefore, gas prices and the stock market), but for some reason are obsessed with millions of fetuses (including whose which have yet to be produced), who cringed when marking their goddam ballots for the treasonous Trump … they got what they wanted today; they won. For now, anyhow. I remember that feeling. I remember well the last week of June in 2015, fondly – the relief, the joy … two decisions – one in favor of keeping Obamacare on the books despite those who wanted it gone just because they hated Obama. Thousands – fuck, millions – of Americans (certainly many here in Missouri) could have been helped by Obamacare. Didn't matter. They wanted that goddam law GONE. And that wanted HIM gone. Both for the same goddam reason – 'cause they hated "that fucking nigger." (I heard it many times.) Then came the gay marriage decision when John Roberts actually had some balls. They wanted that gone, too. Those that hated it weren't affect by it; they just didn't want gays to have the same civil rights as them 'cause they hate "those fucking queers." (Heard that one a bunch, too.) Now the shoe is on the other foot and I'm the one not feeling so great. Except this is different. The decision on gay marriage in 2015 didn't affect others, except those goddam busy bodies who clint to some antiquated notion of love as defined, they claim, in the book that, in truth, doesn't even MENTION gay marriage. These goddam boneheads need to mind their own goddam business. Right. So, unlike that decision seven years ago, this goddam decision today could affect anyone and everyone. As the saying goes, it's a goddam slippery slope. And now the goddam coast is clear; nothing is off the table, now that the Judicial Branch has entered the political arena. How about a "Republican tax" for stupidity? Bring it on! How about an executive order from Biden abolishing the 2nd Amendment? Goddam right. Ha! I can hear those bastards now – "don't take away our guns!" Oh, those goddam guns! (And by the way, the 2nd Amendment, as conceived by Madison, was to ensure funding in the new nation's first budget for a government-sanctioned militia for each state. NOT for every Tom, Dick and red-necked Harry to roam the country wielding weaponry.) So now the Court's resident moron, Clarence Thomas, thinks we should look into the validity of a bunch of other goddam laws that spell freedom for people, though no goddam mention, of course, of invalidating interracial marriage. Huge fucking surprise. Yep – a year and a half after we got rid of Trump, we witness the zenith of his presidency. This is what they put him in to do, because he said he'd do it and he did it – he put in those three nutball judges. He had some help, from McConnell and others who, in truth, don't give a good goddam shit about any goddam fetuses; just about controlling women. Hence, the idea that any declared exceptions for rape, etc., is a joke. Then there are the justices themselves, four of whom now qualify for impeachment under Article II of the Constitution. As for you who voted for Trump just for this day, well you'd better goddam hold on when they come for you and/or one of yours. If you can live with that, and live with your goddam self after the past six years, then more goddam power to you. And oh yeah … FUCK YOU.
June 24, 2022
June 1, 2020
Calling Joe Biden ...
Dear President Biden,
As your VP sweepstakes comes to a head (and not a moment too soon for those on the edge), let me offer some advice: You'd better start thinking STRATEGICALLY and stop toying with the idea of catering to (1) the black vote and/or (2) the progressive vote. Both groups are, unfortunately, non-entities in the long run. The black community in this nation has displayed their voting prowess exactly twice since gaining the power full-on in the middle 1960s. First, in 2008, to contribute to the election of Barack Obama and second, in 2018, as part of the blue wave that swept through the U.S. Congress. (Hell, they didn't even come out to re-elect Obama in 2012.) Then there are the progressives, aka the youth vote, who, this past spring, proved to Bernie Sanders that they are every bit as lazy when it comes to voting as they are relative to other parts of their life.
But back to your choice. First, we eliminate those on either coast, not because four of the six are black but because of the critical need to re-focus on the Midwest, specifically the states in that area that Hillary should've won but neglected during her campaign – Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. So ... goodbye to Harris, Demmings, Bass, Bottoms, Raimondo and Hasson, and on to the Midwest – Baldwin and Whitmer – two good candidates, but simply too white. Not that, as stated earlier, color matters in the long haul, but the non-choosing of a non-white will draw too much attention away from the idiot Trump at a time when a whole lot of attention needs to be placed on Trump by you and your running-mate-to-be. New Mexico governor Grisham is tempting, but (a) you've got the white problem and (b) the Dems are going to get New Mexico anyway. Moving on …
- Stacey Abrams – a rising star but too young and too inexperienced and more often than not, it shows.
- Susan Rice – too much baggage from her Obama years; the Republicans will have a field day.
- Elizabeth Warren – please … she's been out of her league from day one and will cause nothing but trouble for you.
This leaves one more possibility: A very smart veteran from the Midwest who also happens to be a badass and already has a bit of a national following.
Your VP candidate, Mr. President, is Tammy Duckworth – if you want to have a chance to win.
Sincerely,
Mad Bomber
April 9, 2020
Bye, bye Bernie? We'll see.
This week's news was hardly a shocker: "Bernie Sanders kicks off 2024 Presidential
Campaign!"
This
was lost in the announcement by Sanders that he is ending his 2020 campaign.
But, as usual – like 2016 and long before 2024 – Bernie Sanders is not going to
go gently into that good night. Besides repeating his stump speech, he said
that he would continue to collect delegates between now and the convention for
the purpose of power; to "exert significant influence;" and that he
would "work" with Joe Biden. (There was no mention of an endorsement
or even "support.") Yep – this was Sanders' signal to his supporters to
cast a vote for ANYONE but the Democratic candidate.
Remember
2016? When Sanders harangued Hillary Clinton all the way to the convention
despite the forgone conclusion that she would be the nominee weeks and weeks
BEFORE the convention? Well, get ready for a repeat performance. That is
unless, of course, Sanders decides to jump the Dems boat and run as an Independent,
which would have made more sense in the first place given that he has presented himself as an independent
for something like 35 of his 40 years in public service. But that probably
won't happen and we'll continue to witness this phony insist that he's
the one who should be on a
national presidential election ballot as a Democrat-Socialist.
Democrat-Socialist. Jesus. Think about that. That's a goddam contradiction in
terms if there ever was one, anyway; it's like somebody asking you your
favorite ice cream and you responding "chocolatevanilla."
Unfortunately, Bernie can't have it both ways. If
he wants state institutions to give away their college educations, he's got to
go full-blown Socialist. (Free college in a democratic society? That doesn't
work.) Of course, the first thing he'd have to do as President/Comrade would be
to shred that democracy-driven U.S. Constitution and start over, creating a
document that sets the rules Socialist style – when the government runs the
show rather than (ideally in a democracy) the people. This would align Sanders
with Trump, who also wants to run the show. Of course, this isn't the only
thing these two loud-mouthed New Yorkers have in common. Since he ran for
President in 2016, Bernie has called for a revolution – a "major
change" in the White House, as he said recently. Sound familiar? Right. So much for
change.
In
truth, Sanders and Trump are very much alike. And by the way, I first made this
claim long before Trump was
elected in one of the biggest surprises of the last half-century, going back to
the fall of 2015 when I compared them BOTH to William Jennings Bryan. Both
Trump and Sanders had tapped into a lunatic fringe of society by delivering
promises that would never – COULD never – be kept.
At the beginning of March, things looked pretty
good for Bernie. But it's different now. And he'll spend the rest of his life trying to figure
out just how he didn't get those votes, blaming everyone but himself. (Doesn't
THIS sound familiar? An out-of-sorts, self-serving, fantasy-filled New Yorker
who refuses to accept blame for any problems that surround him.)
First,
Bernie remains perpetually pissed at Big Media and the Democratic Establishment
(of which, incidentally, he's been a part of for four decades.) And for weeks
now, he's been unhappy with his principal constituency – the youth vote that he has not only coveted,
but has been boasting about for five years. They just didn't show up.
Despite all the warning of the problems
inherent in a scrambled, elongated process caused by supposedly too many
candidates, the Democrats have their nominee. And they could do worse than Joe
Biden. Mostly because we now have the contest that Trump has feared most: Joe
vs. The Donald. Now if Bernie can just keep from fucking it up for the
Democrats. Again.
Admittedly, Bernie didn't screw
things up all by himself four years ago – he had a lot of help:
- Those righteous numbskulls who hated Trump but opted to cast
a vote for one of the third-party yahoos
- The black vote which didn't show up like it did for Obama in
2008
- Hillary's poor campaign strategy
- The Russian interference
- The Trump Phenomenon
They
all combined to put Trump in the White House. And in 2020, there will be no
Sanders Phenomenon. The power has been consolidated; the alliances have been
formed; and the Democrats now have a consensus candidate, much to the anger of
Sanders and his minions.
[Quick
side question: If Biden had been the lone moderate, would Bernie still be blaming the
establishment? Probably.]
Many
have been surprised to see Joe Biden end up as the nominee, claiming he ran a poor campaign. Did he? In truth, he
seems to have gotten it just about right. And despite Bernie's claim during
their lone solo debate that "I've got your back" should Biden get the
nomination, don't count on it. We've already heard that one, Bernie, and we're
not gonna buy it this time around.
The struggle continues, indeed.
June 5, 2019
Little Lindsey