February 6, 2014
So Much For Cruz Control
Sadly, it's not to be; Ted "The Creep" Cruz is back, mouthing off about this week's State of the Union address, making himself look and sound like an even bigger asshole (if that's possible) and putting at risk more moderate Republican who, if are not guilty by association, are guilty by negligence.
This guy ain't LBJ; can't anyone in the GOP shut him up and shut him down?
Has there ever been a politician more hated by his own party?
In the latest Cruz-credited piece in the Wall Street Journal (the placement of such no doubt funded by the Koch brothers), Cruz deems the Obama administration as an Imperial Presidency. But Cruz more than anyone has touted the idea of an Imperial Government, with all three branches being dominated and operated as extensions of the Tea Party – the sort of single-thought governing process that Karl Rove has been praying to his tattered photo of Lee Atwater for all these years. Then they REALLY wouldn't have to worry about actually delivering solutions, much less ideas, on Healthcare or Immigration.
Yes, Cruz complains about an imperial presidency, but the fact is that Obama has done nothing outside the law. If Cruz wants to scrap the Affordable Care Act, he should follow his own advice of staying within the law by following the proper legislative steps. And if he thinks Obama leads the pack in executive orders, he'd better think again – Obama isn't even close to Reagan, while also trailing Clinton and Bush the Junior.
For the likes of Cruz who have been so worried about Obama's impending dictatorship (five years in the making and counting!), I often wonder what they thought of Dick Cheney's Fourth Reich?
January 31, 2014
Mr. Phil Goes National
Poor Phil Robertson – how dare that
guy from the fancy New York magazine sneak up on him! 'Course, the immediate
and obvious question on everyone's mind was "what the hell was a profile
on this stooge doing in GQ in the first place?" (Other than to sneak up on
him for the purpose of giving further credence to the idea that nice, good 'ole
folks like the Duck Dynasty bunch strewn throughout this big country of ours
aren't really that nice or that good.)
That
said, rarely have I been more at a loss for words on something I thought I had
a pretty decent grip on than the Duck Dynasty phenomenon. Hell, everyone knows
we're a nation of morons. (When Phil says he didn't think that this country had
a history of mistreating blacks, I believe him.) So when close to 10 million
hicks tune in every week to watch a TV show about a family of hicks, I understand. (Even if it's all fake. What was that 'ole Phil said about the
"skits that we come up with?" So much for "reality.")
Anyhow, what I DON'T understand is the repeat viewer. Nothing – I mean NOTHING
– happens on this fucking show. Even for the mindless market Duck Dynasty caters
to, it's got to be boring as hell.
Maybe
it's the idea of the success story that has the populace coming back for more.
This show is proof that everyone knows at least a little about something and
that anyone can have an idea – in this case, it's the humble duck call.
Another
school of thought has folks watching because of the Christian leanings of the show.
And that makes sense, given that the Robertson bunch is comprised of your
typical hypocrites who like to force-feed non-believers their very specific
brand of Christianity. Leaning on the bible as an everlasting crutch may work
with the religious folks … Hey, it's okay
to beat the shit out of a guy and his wife, as long as you declare yourself
born again – and are able to pay the guy off. However, in the real world –
in our nation of laws – conversion is not an excuse.
That
said, they're not BAD people – just your typical hypocritical, far-right,
gun-worshiping, gay-bashing, black-hating, women-abusing tea-baggin' birther
nutballs.
July 13, 2013
Florida's Folly
The sad tale of George Zimmerman and
Trayvon Martin has come to what most likely will amount to only a temporary
conclusion. Blacks and most white liberals are pissed off – and why shouldn't
they be? An unarmed 17-year-old black kid was shot dead. Murdered? That depends
on how one defines "murder." If murder constitutes the extermination
of one human with a gun by another human without one, the circumstances be
damned, then, yes – this is murder. However, if murder is defined as a "crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice
aforethought," (Webster), then we may have an issue.
Did Zimmerman set out to
kill as he stepped out of a vehicle in which the police instructed him to
remain? That's a stretch, even given that community's recent history of being haunted
by trouble-making black male teenagers. Did Zimmerman go looking for trouble?
Maybe. Probably. At the very least, Zimmerman is guilty of disobeying the law.
But the fact is that, the local law enforcement's protestations
notwithstanding, George Zimmerman was simply performing a duty he'd been
empowered to perform by the state of Florida.
What can you expect in a state with both a
Stand Your Ground law and Conceal and Carry law solidly in place? What can you
expect in a country in which 49 of 50 states boast of a Conceal and Carry law?
(With Illinois right around the bend.) What can you expect in a nation that empowers
its citizens to play cop, judge and jury by putting a gun in their hands?
And let's be clear about this: These
accusations that George Zimmerman took the law into his own hands is bullshit.
It's the country – the U.S. Congress, our state congresses, our laws, our
people, you and me – who put the law into George Zimmerman's hands, and puts
the law into EVERYONE'S hands every day by creating and permitting this
vigilante state we find ourselves in.
There are thousands of "neighborhood
watch leaders" like George Zimmerman roaming the gated communities of
these United States, and many of them are probably more ready and more willing
to fire away than was Zimmerman. But neighborhood watch leaders are the least
of it. Somewhere around 10 million U.S. citizens hold a Conceal and Carry
license, which absolutely empowers them to take the law into their own hands,
with far less training, but much more lethal weaponry than actual officers of
the law. Which, as always, begs the question: Why are we wasting money on the
real police?
The bottom line is that George Zimmerman
got the jury he needed to escape – this time. Was the verdict right by Trayvon
Martin? Probably not. But we'll never really know for sure, legally speaking. Because
only two people know – or knew – what happened that night and one of them is
dead. Which lends doubt. And in a land of laws, where there's doubt, there's
innocence.
Legally speaking.
December 30, 2012
FEMA, Welcome to Edna
When
I first saw the news, I didn’t know whether to laugh or scream. The Federal
Government – who it seems everyone hates to some degree or another and should
have a limited role, if any, in people’s daily lives and should be put out of
its misery – had, once again, been asked to bail out Joe America. Only this
time, the request was before rather
than after the goddam fact.
This
happened in Edna, Texas, where a new 2.5 million high school gym will double as
a fallout shelter, of sorts, protecting the sick, elderly, special needs folks,
first responders and local leaders, and all other government-hating Americans
who feel compelled to wallow in the secure environs created by a government
handout they so often rail against in the event of a Hurricane Sandy-like
attack by mother nature. This being Texas, there's probably a whole lot more
irony than would be in most states, given that most of these citizens probably
voted for Mitt Romney – the guy who wanted to abolish FEMA amid cries that the
government is basically good for nothing.
And it's not new gyms that are being built by the Feds,
but community centers, wellness centers and physical rehab facilities – all to
the tune of $34.5 million in Texas and $683 million nationwide.
That's FEMA at its finest, folks, which is all good and
fine, and proof that there is a role for government in people's lives. Except
that this goes beyond irony into the realm of hypocrisy – a place well-known to
the typical tea-party-loving, government-hating majority on the right. And by
the way, FEMA is paying for only 75% of the dome structures, which begs the
question: Where does a town of 5,500 (Edna) come up with $625,000 on its own?
Truth be told, it probably doesn't, but instead relies on
state money to cover the balance. Obviously, it seems that when it comes down
to it, there's probably no government assistance that anyone in need – on the
left OR the right – will turn down.
But fear not – these hypocritical assholes aren't just
found in Texas – they abound from sea to sea, forgetting that the government
instituted, created and have managed the transcontinental railroad system, the
interstate highway system, our military, the VA, Congress' health care system,
Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the postal service, the library system,
the EPA, the Department of Education, the parks department and more. And for
all the ills of any or all of these services, they have, for the most part, served
the citizenry pretty well. It doesn't take your classic bleeding heart liberal
to agree that giving women and minorities the simple right to vote – to be
counted – was the right thing to do.
Of course, when it comes to services, they have been, throughout
the years, cries of privatization for Social Security and other such services.
"Hell, let an American company run things – then they'll be done
right!"
Yeah … an American company … like fucking Lehman
Brothers.
So
much for the big, bad government.
